<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Religious  Violence</title>
	<atom:link href="http://unionindialogue.org/paulknitter/2010/02/16/religiousviolence/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://unionindialogue.org/paulknitter/2010/02/16/religiousviolence/</link>
	<description>Paul Knitter&#039;s multifaith perspectives</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 08 Sep 2010 23:58:48 -0400</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.0</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Paul Knitter</title>
		<link>http://unionindialogue.org/paulknitter/2010/02/16/religiousviolence/comment-page-1/#comment-25</link>
		<dc:creator>Paul Knitter</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 06 Mar 2010 16:52:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://unionindialogue.org/paulknitter/2010/02/16/11/#comment-25</guid>
		<description>I think it is both the threat of &quot;Western secularism&quot; and the reality of economic injustice that are animating, understandably, so-called Islamic radicals.  But &quot;justice&quot; does not have to be &quot;secular justice.&quot;  And I suspect that if there were more genuine justice and economic well-being within the Muslim words, secularism would not be as big a problem. -- Thanks for your provocative comment.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I think it is both the threat of &#8220;Western secularism&#8221; and the reality of economic injustice that are animating, understandably, so-called Islamic radicals.  But &#8220;justice&#8221; does not have to be &#8220;secular justice.&#8221;  And I suspect that if there were more genuine justice and economic well-being within the Muslim words, secularism would not be as big a problem. &#8212; Thanks for your provocative comment.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Makito</title>
		<link>http://unionindialogue.org/paulknitter/2010/02/16/religiousviolence/comment-page-1/#comment-18</link>
		<dc:creator>Makito</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 06 Mar 2010 06:21:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://unionindialogue.org/paulknitter/2010/02/16/11/#comment-18</guid>
		<description>Psychological literature on religiously-motivated terrorism provides us with an interesting empirical point. With respect to Islamic radicals, in not a few cases, what provokes their resentment is not &quot;other religions.&quot; But surprisingly, it is the impending secularism from the West. Is the solution to religious terror secular justice? Maybe. But for many Islamic radicals, the &quot;secular justice&quot; is as much &quot;cause&quot; of their religious terrorism as it is the solution. Religion has a problem; so does secularism.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Psychological literature on religiously-motivated terrorism provides us with an interesting empirical point. With respect to Islamic radicals, in not a few cases, what provokes their resentment is not &#8220;other religions.&#8221; But surprisingly, it is the impending secularism from the West. Is the solution to religious terror secular justice? Maybe. But for many Islamic radicals, the &#8220;secular justice&#8221; is as much &#8220;cause&#8221; of their religious terrorism as it is the solution. Religion has a problem; so does secularism.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
