<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>UNION:inDialogue/ &#187; Pat Robertson</title>
	<atom:link href="http://unionindialogue.org/blog/tag/pat-robertson/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://unionindialogue.org</link>
	<description>Online Conversations from the Union Theological Seminary Community</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 24 Jan 2012 16:00:32 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.0.4</generator>
		<item>
		<title>Who speaks for Christianity?</title>
		<link>http://unionindialogue.org/wheatandthechaff/2009/10/23/who-speaks-for-christianity/</link>
		<comments>http://unionindialogue.org/wheatandthechaff/2009/10/23/who-speaks-for-christianity/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 23 Oct 2009 18:24:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Peter Herman</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Christianity]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Society]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[christian]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[conservative]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[James Cone]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Jay Bakker]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[liberal]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Pat Robertson]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[research]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Rick Warren]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://6.4</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[A popular trope among religious liberals and progressives is that there is a great, unrecognized majority of our kind. If the mainstream media would only seek out Jay Bakker or James Cone instead of Rick Warren or Pat Robertson, we’d get a more accurate image of contemporary Christian belief. It is a hopeful thought to [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>A popular trope among religious liberals and progressives is that there is a great, unrecognized majority of our kind. If the mainstream media would only seek out Jay Bakker or <a href="http://www.utsnyc.edu/jamescone" target="_blank">James Cone</a> instead of Rick Warren or Pat Robertson, we’d get a more accurate image of contemporary Christian belief. It is a hopeful thought to hold and it is seductive in the suggestion that the socially conservative presence in Christianity today is being overreported. Unfortunately, it doesn’t seem to be true.</p>
<p>A study published in September by Public Religion Research has revealed some thought-provoking statistics on this question. The survey queried both conservative and liberal activists who identify as religiously faithful. In the conservative camp, 99% identified as some variety of Christian. The liberals reported 71% of their numbers as Christian. While the data could be interpreted as the liberal activists being a more inclusive community, it also points to the notion that perhaps equating “Christian” and “conservative” may not be that inaccurate after all.</p>
<p>Resources:<br />
<a href="http://www.publicreligion.org/" target="_blank">Public Religion Research<br />
</a><a href="http://www.religiondispatches.org/archive/religiousright/1838/new_poll_shows_religious_right_and_left_look_very_different" target="_blank">Daniel Schultz at Religion Dispatches on this report</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://unionindialogue.org/wheatandthechaff/2009/10/23/who-speaks-for-christianity/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

